With “Regions and Powers,” Buzan and Waever have restated and substantially extended their initial argument of securitization. Elevating regional security to a higher analytical status, the authors present a global map of regional security complexes, aiming at synthesising “realist” and “constructivist” insights along the way. Yet, by reverting to a negative interpretation of security, a materialist conceptualisation of structure and the attribution of process to the unit-level, the authors remain committed to (neo)realist categories undervaluing the impact of cultural factors on international life. A cultural approach to regional politics, it is argued in this article, would present an alternative picture, and would complement the methodology and empirical “operationalisation” of Buzan and Waever’s theoretical statement.

The role and importance of family in social structure and the impact of it on the corruption or health and the development or backwardness of society is a clear fact and so, family law is one of the most important parts of any country legal system. Establishing the legal structure of family necessitates clarifying the exact rights and duties of family members i.e. husband, wife and children. So understanding the legal status of women in society requires studying legal status of women in family. The question is about the legal status of Iranian women in family. Is it an indispensable and unchangeable part of Islam or it is possible to adapt it with the necessities of the time? For answering these questions, the author considers the legal status of women in family by reviewing related regulations and then criticizes the rules and regulations from the point of view of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discriminations against women. Ultimately she presents her idea about corrigibility of this legal structure and the necessity of improving in women rights in family.

The recent 50 years, saw the emergence, in Iran, of a new consciousness of the patterns of the judiciary’s participation opportunities for women. Providing the analysis for realizing women’s access to and opportunities in social and public life including employment, must be done in detailed and comprehensive way, dislodging the assessments from its exclusive focus on political logics. And of course this argument will not be improved as long as the mechanisms of accelerating this participation are not effectively addressed . Such discussion is described in democratic developmental discourse, which targets the matter of participation and non-participation of women in judicial fields and also views the state strategies for the application of the already participatory remedies. The author believes that it should clearly distinguish between temporary special measures taken by the state to accelerate. The achievement of a concrete goal for women of defector or substantive participation, and other general policies adopted to improve the situation of women and combat inequality. That is the functional result in response to the problem.

Nowadays good governance and freedom are a paradigm for developments. This assumption is more important in south countries as same as Iran. Iran is a centric-state and have a powerful influence in Iranian societies. This article analyzes the reformations of states in three levels: Structure, processes and context. Developments are an historical desire of Iranian society and states, but Iranian governments take the directory of developments, not Iranian civil society, because of its income by petrol and natural sources. Nonetheless, Iranian governments couldn’t develop Iran because of their fails on theoretical and practical capacity. This article proposes that Iranian governments should concentrate on the Iranian knowledge capacity and developments data analyzing. The science of developments could forward Iranian society to a prepare a guaranty for freedom of expression in this regards which is an characteristic for good governance.