In this article it will be argued that the “war on terrorism” is not only a deceptive concept – in fact an oxymoron - but represents itself a form of terror. By designating terrorism as a global conspiracy threatening to attack anywhere and at any time, whole populations are terrorized to fear the unknown and consent to increased surveillance, security measures and restrictions of liberties. The events of 9/11, as presented by mass media, provided the necessary shock to prepare the American and West European public for supporting wars against other nations and accept increased police surveillance. By exposing the “war on terrorism” as a fraud and the 9/11 crime as its fraudulent justification, it will be easier to mobilize public resistance against further wars and the creeping emergence of a totalitarian world order.

It seems that there is a historical confrontation between domestic and outside environment in defining the main role of Iranian Foreign Policy. While the domestic variables encourage idealism, asertiveness and becoming a regional dominant power, international system has been the main obstacle to realize the ambitious goals. Due to growing the importance of outside variables in the globalizing world and particularly in the aftermath of 9/11 events, re-emerging and reinforcing of mentioned confrontation is possible again. In this regard, the present article argues that having an effective strategy in Iran’s foreign policy is dependant on considering four variables in four levels. Although it is too difficult to find a solution for this confrontation in near future, having an effective strategy may reduce its negative consequences.

In spite of living in a revolutionary age in many ways, it is widely agreed that the world today represents one of the most critical turning points in valves and perceptions. Several different metaphors or analysis like Natural Science have been proposed to explain the split, but nature has its own value and perception as before. Thus how can we attack the idolatry of religious and spiritual motivations? It does not take much imagination to see how human beings have in fact not removed from their connection to reality. For a complex variety of causes, the author has a belief that spiritual revitalization in 21st century can take place in the way that the insidious factors of materialism could be transformed. A growing chorus of voices has been pointing out the roots of the crisis: Liberalism, Marxism, Existentialism, Positivism. The following article is up to discuss these views. Also, there were men of Islamic conviction and he wishes to point out crucial aspects of their achievements, particularly during the times of this Western paradigm transition.

Resolution 1441 adopted by United Nations Security Counsil was not an authorization to America and its allies to use force against Iraq. There is no possible defense of American unilateralism on war against terrorism and worst abuses of human rights to force on to the United Nations. European countries promote the EU’s principals and are after the main regional instruments for the protection of human rights. These instruments do not enshrine common values and are not universal. The author has explored some international instruments in the field of human rights and also convention on elimination of all forms of discrimination against women to refer to the different cultural and regional traditions. He believes that justice as philosophy is a trugh seeker and the reason behind every issue, but justice as law is the same as positive law which means public international law in the matter this paper concerns. So, patterns of power relations requires to be subject to fundamental principals of mankind. The principals which are common to all and do not have conflict with positive law.